This page is available in English. Switch to English

Skip to content
E-Commerce Audit

Tyrolean E-Commerce Under the Microscope — How 303 Local Online Shops Actually Perform

Tyrolean e-commerce analysis — magnifying glass over shop data

I wanted to understand the state of e-commerce in Tirol. Not from industry reports or general estimates, from actual data about the shops that are actually operating here.

So I scanned all 303 online shops listed on shop.tirol, the official e-commerce directory maintained by the Tyrolean government and WKO. 289 of those shops were reachable and fingerprinted for platform, technology stack, and performance signals. The rest were either offline, redirecting, or returning errors.

Here’s what the data looks like.

Methodology

The scan used automated tools to analyse publicly observable signals: HTML structure, JavaScript patterns, HTTP response headers, and meta tags. This is the same fingerprinting approach used by security researchers and competitive intelligence tools. It doesn’t touch anything that isn’t already publicly accessible to any visitor.

Performance data came from the Google PageSpeed Insights API. Security data came from header analysis and common misconfiguration checks. All findings are based on what’s visible from the outside, which is also what’s visible to anyone else.

No invasive testing. No guesswork. Just what the shops are already broadcasting.

The platform landscape

Platform Shops Share
WooCommerce 58 20%
Magento (all versions) 31 11%
Shopify 24 8%
Shopware 19 7%
TYPO3 5 1.7%
Gambio 5 2%
PrestaShop 4 1.4%
OXID 3 1%
Unidentified 155 54%

WooCommerce is the most common identifiable platform, which makes sense. It’s free, it runs on WordPress, and most small shops don’t need anything more complex. Magento holds 11%, which is a significant share for a platform that requires substantially more investment to deploy and maintain.

That 54% "unidentified" category is worth noting. These are shops where the platform couldn’t be determined from public signals, which typically means custom-built systems, white-label solutions, or platforms too small to fingerprint reliably. Some of these will be serious custom builds. Many are probably basic platforms with enough template customisation to obscure the signature.

What the Magento segment looks like

31 confirmed Magento installations, and 3 of them are still running Magento 1, which reached End of Life in June 2020. Nearly six years without security patches, and two of those three shops were operating with completely unprotected admin panels.

The 28 Magento 2 shops I measured for performance averaged 55 out of 100 on mobile PageSpeed. 82% scored below 60. Only 4 scored above 80. The shops at the top of that range, scoring 91, 93, and 100, had migrated to the Hyvä frontend. The shops at the bottom were on Luma, some scoring in the single digits.

The security picture

The deeper security audit covered 37 Magento shops specifically. The findings weren’t encouraging: 97% were missing the Permissions-Policy header, 92% were missing Referrer-Policy, 81% were missing HSTS. The average shop was missing 3.9 out of 7 critical headers. Two had none at all.

If those numbers reflect the Magento segment, the broader 303-shop landscape is likely similar or worse. WooCommerce shops, Shopify, and custom builds have their own common misconfigurations. The patterns differ, but the underlying issue, security as an afterthought, doesn’t.

What this tells us about Tyrolean e-commerce

A few things stand out.

The long tail is very long. Most Tyrolean online shops are small. They’re running WooCommerce or basic platforms, serving local customers, operating on limited technical budgets. That’s not a criticism; it’s just the shape of the market.

Magento shops are outliers by revenue, not by count. 11% of shops, but a disproportionate share of the region’s online revenue. SportOkay, EGLO, Naturabiomat: these are not small operations. The concentration of commercially significant shops on Magento is why the security and performance findings there matter more than the percentages suggest.

Mobile performance is a widespread problem across all platforms. This isn’t a Magento-specific issue. The shops I measured across the broader landscape consistently underperform on mobile, which is where the majority of their visitors are arriving from. The investment in mobile experience simply hasn’t kept pace with the shift in traffic.

The opportunity is real, and it’s local. Most of these shops are competing with each other, and most of them have similar technical gaps. Closing those gaps, performance, security, modern frontend, isn’t just risk mitigation. It’s a competitive edge in a market where the baseline is low.

What this means if you operate in Tirol

The data is what it is: most shops in the region have room to improve on both security and performance, and most of them probably don’t know the specifics.

That’s not a reason to panic. It’s a reason to actually check.


Google’s PageSpeed Insights and securityheaders.com will both give you a starting point in under a minute. If you want to understand what the results mean in the context of the broader Tyrolean market, feel free to get in touch.

Austria E-Commerce Magento Market Research Tirol WooCommerce